Showing the last closed period
· viewed September 2026
What the next owner is buying
76.4%
gross margin on $119.4k of revenue. The
product works, it is priced below what the market bears, and the trading
season already turns a profit.
Four named actions reach
+$4.2k a year
None of them requires growth
beyond three wholesale accounts already identified. The largest single one
is a conversation with the landlord.
The path to a profitable business
Action
Worth
Running result
Where it stands today
normalised, twelve months to
August 2026
-$21.5k
Price increase, 12.3% weighted, volume held
+$11.9k
-$9.6k
Three year-round wholesale accounts
+$3.2k
-$6.4k
Rent renegotiated to $3,000 a month
+$8.6k
+$2.2k
Closed-season utilities halved
+$2.0k
+$4.2k
Read this as the destination, not year one. These
are full run rate figures, the shape of the business once all four are in
place. Year one is slower because the price rise lands in October and the
accounts in November, and because $6.0k of one-off
wholesale income from last year is not assumed to repeat. On that basis year
one lands near -$2.0k, roughly breakeven, and the full
benefit arrives in year two.
Why the margin holds
Revenue
register net sales plus wholesale
channels
$119.4k
Cost of goods
$28.2k
Gross profit
$91.2k
At 76.4% every additional dollar of sales
drops 76 cents to the bottom line. That is what makes the
price increase and the wholesale accounts worth so much relative to their
size, and it is why the fix is a cost conversation rather than a growth
project.
Demand responds when something new is
offered
Sundaes
$5.1k
Store freezer items
$4.3k
Delivery items
$3.0k
Freezer accounts
$1.1k
Bulk orders
$450
Lines introduced mid-season
none of
these existed before April and none replaced an existing product
$13.9k
12.4% of the year's sales came from
products added part way through it. Sundaes went from nothing to
$5.1k in five months. The freezer and delivery lines went from
nothing to $8.3k. This is the most useful fact in the file for a
buyer, because it is evidence about demand rather than about accounting: the
counter absorbs new products without extra rent, extra fixtures or extra
hours, and the shop has barely started testing that.
The trading season already works
Trading season, March to October
eight months
$114.6k
+$2.8k
Closed season, November to February
four months
$4.8k
-$24.3k
Full year
$119.4k
-$21.5k
Eight months of trading make money. The problem is that
the lease runs twelve. That is a fixable structure, not a failing
business, and it is precisely why the path above works without needing more
customers.
What the building costs while it is shut
Rent
$15.3k
34% of the year's spend
Utilities
$4.1k
25% of the year's spend
Payroll
$4.0k
11% of the year's spend
Cost of goods
$3.6k
13% of the year's spend
Business services
$1.8k
34% of the year's spend
Everything else
$256
1% of the year's spend
Four closed months
against
$4.8k of revenue
$29.1k
$21.2k of that is rent, utilities and
business services on an empty building. A third of the year's occupancy cost
is incurred in the months that earn 4.0% of
the revenue. Every year-round wholesale account chips at this, and a lease
renegotiation removes it wholesale.
Where the money goes
Rent
$44.6k
37.3% of revenue
Payroll
$35.5k
29.7% of revenue
Utilities
$16.1k
13.5% of revenue
Business services
$5.5k
4.6% of revenue
Repairs, recurring
$3.9k
3.3% of revenue
Card and bank fees
$3.9k
3.3% of revenue
Advertising
$2.1k
1.7% of revenue
Everything else
$1.2k
1.0% of revenue
Normalised operating expense
$112.7k
94.4%
Rent is 37.3% of revenue against a
6% to 10% norm for food service. At $3,713 a month
this shop would need about $445.5k of sales for
occupancy to sit in a normal range. It is not a line to trim, it is the
structural fact the business sits on, and it should be the first item in any
purchase negotiation rather than an inherited condition.
What has to be solved
Occupancy cost is the structural issue
Rent and utilities together are 50.8% of revenue, and twelve months of lease sit on eight months of trading. Until that changes, every other improvement is filling a bucket with a hole in it.
What to do about it. Open the lease before agreeing a price. A reduction of $1,261 a month is worth more than every other action here combined, and at $2,451 a month the business breaks even on today's sales with nothing else changed.
Four months of the year earn almost nothing
November to February produce $4.8k and consume $29.1k. The building is paid for whether or not anyone is in it.
What to do about it. Three options, not exclusive: grow year-round wholesale until the winter carries itself, find a seasonal sublet or shared use for the space, or cut the standby load so a closed month costs less to hold.
Nobody has ever measured what brings people in
Advertising ran at $2,053 for the year with no way to say what it returned, and the owner's own read is that most custom is repeat. The mid-season product additions suggest the upside is real, but it has never been tested deliberately.
What to do about it. Set a customer count baseline from the register before the next campaign starts, then read it monthly. The register already carries unit counts, so this costs nothing but the discipline.
Discounting climbed at the end of the season
Discounts and comps ran 2.5% to 3.7% of sales through the spring and then 8.1% in July and 9.0% in August, about $3,100 across the two months.
What to do about it. Worth knowing whether that was a deliberate promotion or drift. If it is drift it cancels a quarter of the price increase before it starts.
A fifth of sales arrives as cash
$25.0k came through the drawer. The accounting system's card line cannot see it, so it does not appear in reported income, and a buyer will ask where it went.
What to do about it. Reconcile the cash to bank deposits before diligence opens. Card tips paid out of the till explain a large part of it. Answered in advance this strengthens the revenue story; answered under questioning it does the opposite.
The evidence underneath
How the starting figure was built
Register net sales
gross sales $112.0k
less $6.8k of discounts and comps and
$33 of returns
$105.1k
Delivery and wholesale accounts
billed outside the
register
$10.8k
Other product income
three separate wholesale
lots
$6.0k
Less orders counted in both systems
($2.4k)
Revenue
$119.4k
Cost of goods
$28.2k
Operating expenses as booked
$114.0k
Plus August costs not yet entered
the books were run
two days after month end, so August rent, utilities and business services
had not posted. Accrued at the three month average, and this is the only
estimated figure in the document.
$5.8k
Less one-time reopening repairs
March, bringing the
shop back after a closed winter. The $3.9k spent April to
July stays in as ordinary upkeep.
($7.1k)
Normalised operating result
-$21.5k
Three adjustments here are ones a buyer's accountant makes
in the first hour: net sales rather than gross, unposted August costs
accrued, and only the genuinely non-recurring repairs added back. They are
made already, in the seller's own document, which is the point.
Reading the register against the books
The two systems disagree about revenue by roughly $17,800 across the year.
It looks alarming and it is arithmetic.
Card payments
$92.2k
Less sales tax collected on those cards
($4.6k)
Less tips collected on those cards
($6.5k)
Card revenue
$81.1k
Register net sales settled by card
$80.9k
Unexplained difference
$233
The accounting system's card line is a bank deposit, gross
of sales tax and tips, and it cannot see cash. The shop takes
$25.0k a year in cash, 20.8%
of everything collected. Strip the tax and tips and count cash separately and
the two agree to $233 on a $119.4k business.
Revenue here comes from the register, which counts every tender. Costs come
from the books.
How to read this document
Everything except the path is history, and it traces to two files: the
register's gross sales report for September 2025 to August 2026 and the
profit and loss for the same period. Both are available. Fourteen product
lines and twelve expense lines were read month by month rather than as annual
totals, which is where the seasonal and product findings come from.
Every forward figure is labelled as plan and built from a named action
with its arithmetic shown, never from a growth rate applied to last year.
One historical figure is estimated rather than reported: the
$5.8k of August costs that had not been entered when the
books were run.
AI where it helps, human where it matters.Great Path Advisors